Questions

Asking right questions is more important than worrying for right answers.
The Questions  I ask direct my thinking. And this thinking process is very important. So, to get the right questions, we have to ask more questions.

To ask more questions, our thinking has to be  divergent rather than convergent.

So which way it is better.

Is it to ask one question at a time?

or

is it better to write down all questions at once and think about them later?

 But, writing all the questions at once has the possibility in limiting the time for divergent thinking. And also, after thinking about one question and arriving at the very reasonable answer has the possibility of stopping there and not asking enough questions.

I think I've to follow negative empiricism rather than a positive one, because it is easy to get confirming evidence rather than dis confirming one. Some times dis-confirming evidence is the best. It is difficult to prolong the quest for dis-confirming evidence.

Still, I've to adopt this method of thinking. How? Being skeptical?

 Skeptical empiricism is the good way.

This needs to preserved :D

"When I saw you, I was lost.
I wondered you were a ghost.
When I befriended you, I was reborn.
But I din't know that you have so much scorn.
She parted from Me.
I realized She took away most of ME.




Neither poetic nor creative. It's just framed for the last sentence I felt real. As for the rhymes, we can get anything we need from the web.